The Weekly Shtikle Blog

An online forum for sharing thoughts and ideas relating to the Parshas HaShavua

View Profile

Friday, May 19

The Weekly Shtikle - Behar / Bechukosai

The Weekly Shtikle is dedicated le'iluy nishmas my dear Zadie and Bubbie, HaRav Chaim Yaakov ben Yitzchak and Yehudis bas Reuven Pinchas.

    This week's parsha begins with the laws of Shemittah and Yoveil. In last week's parsha, the mitzvah of Sefiras HaOmer was discussed. The similarities between the two are clear. We are told in the gemara (Rosh HaShanah 5a) declares that there is a mitzvah to count the weeks of Sefiras HaOmer as well as the days. This is in direct correlation with the counting of the Shemittah years in conjunction with the counting towards Yoveil.
    The technical similarities are obvious. What bothered me, however, was that if these two mitzvos are so technically similar, what is the underlying concept that connects the two. Yes, they are similar - but why? I have not had a chance to research this fully as it has been a busy week. But I would like to open the floor. and ask for your input on the matter. I would appreciate if suggestions were posted on the blog but email will do if necessary.
    One interesting distinction between the two is noted by R' Moshe Hauer in this week's bulletin for his shul, B'nei Jacob Sha'arei Zion in Baltimore. The mitzvah of Yoveil is a constantly cycling one. As soon as one cycle is over, another begins. Conversely, Sefiras HaOmer is designated to one specific time of year and does not restart until the next year.
    Just some food for thought.
    Have a good Shabbos.
Eliezer Bulka

Friday, May 12

פרשת אמור - Priestly lineage

At the beginning of this week's parsha, (21:2) we are told that a Kohein, although he is not permitted to become tamei meis, he is allowed to do so for his mother or father and other immediate family. The Midrash on this pasuk states that after the pasuk has told me that he may become tamei for his mother, I might have thought only for his mother may he become tamei for she is definitely his mother. But his father is a safeik, for we can never be 100% sure that this is in fact his father, but we consider him his father only by a "chazakah," an assumption of sorts. Therefore, we might have thought it does not apply to his father. So the pasuk tells us "ul'aviv," that it applies to his father as well.

In T`shuvos haRashb"a (27), R"Y asks the Rashb"a what kind of assumption would that have been? Either way he can become tamei for his father. If this man is in fact his father, then he may become tamei because he is his father. But if this man is not his father, then who says he is a Kohein?! Surely, he may become tamei for him.

Rashb"a answered him that surely as far as permission to become tamei for one's father, we would not have had any doubt that this Kohein MAY become tamei for his father. However, from the words at the end of the next pasuk, "lah yitama," we learn that not only is the Kohein permitted to become tamei for these relatives but he is required to. The intention of the Midrash is that with regards to the requirement to become tamei, since there is a doubt as to whether this man is this Kohein's father, that it does not apply to him.

Rashb"a offers another answer, that the kedushah of the Kohein which prohibits him from becoming tamei is because, as the pasuk states, "ki es lechem elokecha hu makriv." Chasam Sofer in his t`shuvos (Yoreh Dei'ah 338) explains that since we allow this Kohein to bring korbanos, whether it is rightfully done or not, he is elevated to the kedushah of a Kohein and may not become tamei. Therefore, a suspicion as to the paternity of father, while it may create doubt as to his permission to become tamei for him, will not affect his general prohibition to become tamei. Klei Chemdah argues with Chasam Sofer on one point, that the deciding factor is not whether he brings korbanos but rather whether he may eat them. For if it were dependent on bringing korbanos, then it would not apply to "ba'al mum." But we know that even a ba'al mum may not become tamei. So either way, it comes out that a Kohein involved in Korbanos is subject to the prohibitions of tum'ah, no matter what our doubts are regarding his father.

שבת שלום