The Weekly Shtikle Blog

An online forum for sharing thoughts and ideas relating to the Parshas HaShavua

View Profile

Friday, January 17

The Weekly Shtikle - Shemos

A special Weekly Shtikle mazal tov to my niece Rachelle (Levy) on her marriage this week to Binyamin Zev Bausk. Mazal tov to the extended Levy, Bulka and Bausk mishpachos.

As sefer Shemos begins, before Moshe Rabbeinu is even born, we are told of the great heroism of Shifrah and Puah who defy Paroah's orders to abort all newborn boys. When confronted by Paroah, they manage to escape retribution with a believable alibi. After this, we are told (1:20) that HaShem did good for the midwives and the nation multiplied and increased greatly. What is the good that HaShem provided to the midwives? We are likely familiar with Rashi's interpretation. The reward is spoken about only in the next pasuk – "vaya'as lahem batim." But the obvious difficulty with this is that the two phrases are separated. If the expounding of vayeitev is vaya'as, why aren't the two phrases next to each other?

Malbim explains simply that Shifrah and Puah put themselves in grave danger of personal harm and Paroah even understood they were not being completely honest with him. Nevertheless, HaShem did good to them that Paroah decided not to punish them in any way.

Ohr HaChayim, however, provides an understanding that works with the flow of the pesukim. When we toil and put all of our efforts into a specific task, sometimes the success of that task is the greatest reward we can get. Therefore, vayirev ha'am, the great growth and thriving of the nation, which was a direct result of their efforts, was itself a great reward.

Have a good Shabbos.

 

Eliezer Bulka
WeeklyShtikle@weeklyshtikle.com

Shtikle Blog Weekly Roundup:
Dikdukian: Nothing to See but Fear Itself

Dikduian: Bas Paroah
Dikduian: From the Children of the Hebrews
Dikduian: The Strange Thing about Straw
Dikduian: Affliction
Dikduian: Raamseis

Dikduian: Dikduk Observations on Shemos by Eliyahu Levin

Please visit the new portal for all Shtikle-related sites, www.weeklyshtikle.com

The Weekly Shtikle and related content are now featured on BaltimoreJewishLife.com

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to shtiklelist+unsubscribe@weeklyshtikle.com.

Friday, January 10

The Weekly Shtikle - Vayechi

This past Sunday, 5 Teves, was the 47th yahrtzeit  of my wife's grandfather, Rabbi Dr Israel Frankel, a"h. This week's shtikle, a most appropriate one, is dedicated le'iluy nishmaso, Yisroel Aryeh ben Asher Yeshayahu.

This coming Sunday, 12 Teves, is the 17th yahrtzeit of Rabbi Joseph Schechter of Ner Yisrael. This week's shtikle is dedicated le'iluy nishmaso, Yoseif ben Eliezer Z'ev.

Two geography notes:

When Yaakov blesses Yoseif and his children before he blesses all his sons together, he tells Yoseif (48:22), "I have given you an additional shechem, more than that of your brothers." Rashi offers two interpretations of the word "shechem." He explains, not without adequate support from other pesukim in Tanach, that the word "shechem" means portion. In halachah, the first-born son receives a double portion of the inheritance. Instead of Reuvein being the beneficiary of that privilege, it was granted to Yoseif as both his sons received a portion in Eretz Yisrael. The other explanation offered by Rashi is that this is a reference to the city of Shechem. In reward for his toil in assuring his father a proper burial, Yaakov granted the city of Shechem to Yoseif for burial and as an extra portion of land for the inheritance of his descendants.

In sefer Yehoshua (21), we are given an exhaustive list of the different cities that were designated for Kohanim and Levi'im. Among the cities designated for Levi'im was Shechem. Additionally, we are told in the previous perek that Shechem was a city of refuge for accidental killers. That being so, of what significance is this gift to Yoseif if his descendants would not ultimately settle in that city?

The gemara (Makkos 10a) presents a similar difficulty with a different city. Chevron was another city that was designated for Kohanim as well as a city of refuge. However, we are told (Shofetim 1:20) that Chevron was given to Caleiv ben Yefuneh as decreed by Moshe Rabbeinu. Abbayei's answer is a single word, parvadaha, the origin of which is the subject of some discussion. The essence of his response seems to be that the fields and courtyards around the city were given to Calev. Perhaps this answers the above question as well. Although Yoseif's descendants may never have settled in Shechem itself, the fields and courtyards were available to them and this was indeed a significant gift for Yoseif.  (Unfortunately, today, the inhabitants of that city are not descendants of Yoseif by any means.)

 

 

When Yaakov's sons bring him back to Eretz Canaan to be buried (50:10), they reach "Goren HaAtad asher be'eiver haYardein." The term eiver haYardein in most cases refers to the eastern side of the Yardein. Also, since the word eiver implies a crossing over, and they started off to the West of the Yardein, "eiver haYardein" would seem to imply the Eastern side. This is hard to understand for there is a rather direct route from Mitzrayim straight up to Chevron without encountering the Yardein. Why would the brothers end up on the other side of the Yardein?

The easiest answer to this question is that of the Chizkuni, that here "eiver haYardein" refers to the western side, as it does in Devarim 11:30. However, the most interesting answer is that of Rabbeinu Meyuchas, that in bringing Yaakov to be buried, the sons went around Eretz Yisrael in the same manner that B'nei Yisrael did when they left Mitzrayim. The sefer Torah Sheleimah quotes from an obscure source that this is the meaning of the pasuk (Tehilim 114:3) "hayam ra'ah vayanos," for the ark of Yosef, "haYardein yisov le'achor," for the ark of Yaakov, that the sons of Yaakov had the Yardein split for them at the same point that it split for B'nei Yisrael. So, suggests Rabbeinu Meyuchas, they were indeed on the eastern side of the Yardein as part of their journey and that place, "Avel Mitzrayim," was indeed "Avel haShitim" where B'nei Yisrael cried for Moshe Rabeinu.

Chazak, Chazak, veNischazeik!

Have a good Shabbos.

 

Eliezer Bulka

WeeklyShtikle@weeklyshtikle.com

Shtikle Blog Weekly Roundup:

Dikdukian: You Make the Call: Aveil Mitzrayim

Dikdukian: Efrasah – what is your real name?


Please visit the new portal for all Shtikle-related sites, www.weeklyshtikle.com

The Weekly Shtikle and related content are now featured on BaltimoreJewishLife.com

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to shtiklelist+unsubscribe@weeklyshtikle.com.

Friday, December 27

The Weekly Shtikle - Mikeitz

I have always found Mikeitz to be somewhat of a unique parsha. While dialog in the Torah is traditionally terse and concise, I find the exchanges in Mikeitz to be more thorough and detailed. Additionally, the text is rich with evocative narrative detailing various emotions such as Yoseif being moved to tears on numerous occasions. Yet, with all this extended detail, there is still so much left to be analyzed and interpreted, particularly when it comes to the exchanges between Yoseif and his brothers. Shaarei Aharon enumerates 23 different approaches to understanding the initial charge of espionage and the brothers' response.

 

One chapter of the story that caught my attention was the imprisonment of the brothers on the premise that one of them would have to return to retrieve Binyamin. This is followed by Yoseif's change of heart, opting instead to send them all home and only detain one brother. After this is suggested it is recounted, (42:20) "vaya'asu chein," and so they did. What did they do? Not only did they not seem to act right away, it was ultimately Yoseif who separated Shimon. Many commentaries conclude that this simply indicates that they agreed. This is followed by the heart-wrenching exchange between the brothers as they finally begin to lament their treatment of Yoseif. Why is this triggered precisely at this moment? Why did they not express these feelings when they were all thrown in jail?

 

The first approach I will explore is that of R' Yaakov Kaminetsky in Emes L'Yaakov. He understands that when Yoseif charged his brothers with espionage, the charge itself wasn't as significant as the greater lesson he was trying to convey to the brothers – that things aren't always as they seem. Sometimes, one can be absolutely sure of something but if he takes a good, honest and unbiased look at the situation, he discovers things to be quite different. The brothers were most certain that Yoseif was deserved of death or slavery and acted upon that conviction swiftly. Now, the viceroy of Egypt was certain that these men were spies and incarcerated them. He then comes back three days later having reconsidered his charge. Additionally, if he sends only one brother back, he would not be capable of hauling the produce necessary for the rest of the family. So, despite his high position of authority, he is able to rethink his position and recant. The brothers got the message. That is why they, too, only at that moment, begin to regret their treatment of Yoseif and the lack of compassion they exercised when carrying out what they had perceived to be a just punishment.

 

This beautiful approach still leaves the words "vaya'asu chein" unexplained. For this, we turn to Mahari"l Diskin's analysis. Yoseif's revised plan involved detaining just one of the brothers. It was initially up the brothers, in theory, to choose which one of them would stay behind. This is problematic as it touches on a quandary discussed in Yerushalmi (Terumos 8:4) regarding whether it is permissible to give over a single person to the authorities in order to save others. This topic is far too vast to cover here but it seems that a drawing of lots would be a suitable method of deciding who is chosen in this case. This is what the brothers began to do as they discussed their guilt in the treatment of Yoseif. Reuvein therefore pleads his case that he should be excluded from this lot since he advocated for the brothers to let Yoseif be. (See the text of the Mahari"l Diskin for a much more thorough discussion about the nuances of such a lottery.) So that is why the brothers are discussing what they did to Yoseif at this juncture and the discussion itself is the explanation of "vaya'asu chein." Since the brothers could not agree on how to choose one of them, Yoseif stepped in and made the decision for them, grabbing Shimon who certainly bore much of the responsibility for his fate.

 

Have a Chaunkah Samei'ach, a good Shabbos!

 

Eliezer Bulka
WeeklyShtikle@weeklyshtikle.com

 

Shtikle Blog Weekly Roundup:
Dikdukian: Clear the Halls (Chanukah)

Dikdukian: Na'asah Nes

Dikdukian: Who's agitating my dots?

Dikdukian: Be Strong

Dikdukian: Just Do It!

Dikdukian: You Make the Call: Ukra'ahu


Please visit the new portal for all Shtikle-related sites, www.weeklyshtikle.com

The Weekly Shtikle and related content are now featured on BaltimoreJewishLife.com

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to shtiklelist+unsubscribe@weeklyshtikle.com.

Friday, December 13

The Weekly Shtikle - Vayishlach

Before his meeting with Eisav, Yaakov engages in an epic battle with a mysterious foe. Although Yaakov seems to overpower him, his adversary pulls a crafty maneuver on Yaakov's sciatic nerve and causes the showdown to come to an abrupt end. We are told (32:33) "Therefore B'nei Yisrael shall not eat the sinew of the vein which is on the hollow of the thigh until this day for he touched the hollow of Yaakov's thigh in the sinew of the vein." Indeed, we are forbidden from eating that part of the animal due to its significance in this episode. However, this pasuk does not appear immediately after the fight. The Torah first tells us that the sun had risen and Yaakov was still limping on his thigh. Only then does the Torah proceed with "Therefore..."

I believe the message here is that the prohibition against eating the sciatic nerve is not simply because it was used to end the battle with the angel. The significant fact in this episode is that this injury caused Yaakov lingering pain. The confrontation between Yaakov and what is commonly accepted to have been the angelic manifestation of Eisav is often understood as a harbinger of the eternal strife between Yaakov and Eisav, a constant war of values and ideals (See Sefer HaChinuch Mitzvah 3.) This war is never won, at least not until the end of days. Yaakov's injury symbolizes our weak point that Eisav is able to exploit. It is not simply the initial injury that is significant. It is Yaakov being hampered by that injury even after the sun rose bringing the dawn of a new day that symbolizes the constant thorn in our side that is Eisav. This is why we must constantly be mindful of this threat and thus, refrain from eating the sciatic nerve.

Have a good Shabbos.

 

Eliezer Bulka
WeeklyShtikle@weeklyshtikle.com

Shtikle Blog Weekly Roundup:

Dikdukian: The Great Dishon Confusion

Dikdukian: Appearances

Dikdukian: Efrasah, What is your Real Name?

Al Pi Cheshbon: Goats and Amicable Numbers by Dr. Ari Brodsky

Please visit the new portal for all Shtikle-related sites, www.weeklyshtikle.com

The Weekly Shtikle and related content are now featured on BaltimoreJewishLife.com

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to shtiklelist+unsubscribe@weeklyshtikle.com.

Friday, December 6

The Weekly Shtikle - Vayeitzei (Special Edition)

This week's shtikle comes with mazal tov wishes to two of my avid readers and constructive critics.

Mazal tov to Rabbi and Dr. Mordechai Weiskopf on the recent marriage of their daughter, Rivka, to Chaim Monderer.

And mazal tov to Mr. and Mrs. David Farkas on the upcoming bar mitzvah of their son, Noam, this shabbos.

In honour of the bar mitzvah, here is a beautiful shtikle compiled by the father of the bar mitzvah boy, (followed by an editorial note of my own.)

וַיִּפְגַּע בַּמָּקוֹם וַיָּלֶן שָׁם כִּי בָא הַשֶּׁמֶשׁ וַיִּקַּח מֵאַבְנֵי הַמָּקוֹם וַיָּשֶׂם מְרַאֲשֹׁתָיו וַיִּשְׁכַּב בַּמָּקוֹם הַהוּא.

In a well-known statement, Chazal state that only now did Yaakov permit himself to sleep, a luxury he did not allow himself the previous fourteen years studying in the Yeshiva of [Shem, by now deceased] and Eber. If one calculates the timeline, it emerges that Yaakov was away from home a total of 36 years, all in which time Yaakov failed to keep the mitzvah of honoring one's parents. However, Chazal also observe that Yaakov received Divine recompense for this failure only for 22 of those years, while the 14 years spent in study were absolved.

R' Yaakov Kamenetsky questions this. If a father asks his son to buy him a pair of shoes, and the son stops on the way to sit and learn, would not that be considered a failure – let the son learn sometime else! By the same token, after his parents told Yaakov to go to Haran, what gave him the right to stop for so long a period of time? Moreover, R' Yaakov points out, it was not as though Yaakov hadn't learned anything till then – he had always studied by his father and grandfather. What, then, was so special about this period of time that Chazal felt it excusable from parental obligations?

According to R' Yaakov, it was because it was during this period that Yaakov learned the secrets of how to survive in exile. Shem and Eber grew up in the period of the Flood and then the Great Dispersal, epochs in which very few men were upright and righteous. Shem and Eber were survivors, who had successfully insulated themselves from the ungodly zeitgeist howling all around them. Abraham and Isaac, by contrast, lived their lives away from all evil influences. So much so that Sarah refused to allow Ishamel to remain in the house after she saw him "jesting" (מצחק). We might add, Abraham also deliberately separated himself from Lot. Thus, when Jacob was leaving Eretz Yisrael to live among the ungodly, he needed to learn strategies of how to keep himself pure and pristine in such an unforgiving environment. As R' Yaakov phrases it, he needed to learn Toras Ha-Galus – and for that he needed the Torah of Shem and Eber, not the Toras Ha-Aretz he learned with his father and grandfather.

Thus, the comparison to the son learning after being asked to buy his father shoes is no longer apt. The better comparison would be a father asking his son to buy him a lulav, with the son first stopping at the beis medrash to learn the signs of kosher lulav. Clearly this would be seen not merely as excusable delay, but laudable and praiseworthy.

While R. Yaakov elaborates on this point with proofs and details, what remains to be asked, and what he does not address, is what, exactly, were these strategies? What were these tools that Yaakov learned, to survive in the great wilderness?

For this, I can do no better than to repeat the insights of Noam Jacobson (YouTube link) who highlights three things Yaakov did that all of us can, and indeed, must learn from and emulate.

1)      Yaakov stayed in contact with God. Every step of the way, from even before he reached Haran, we find him engaged in prayer and meditation. He saw God in his dreams, because God was always on his mind.

 

2)      He did not rely on God alone. Rather, he  utilized the tools and technology available. He made himself rich using such techniques, through animal husbandry and genetics still not fully understood today.

 

3)      He did not allow himself to be taken advantage of. As the Torah says, Yaakov "stole" the heart of Laban by leaving him. The phrase is deliberate, intending to underscore that after Laban cheated him from his wives and then his wages, Jacob gave it right back to him, as they say – in his face. "Righteousness" does not mean allowing oneself to be played.

 

These three lessons – keeping God uppermost in one's thoughts, but still making your best efforts, and not allowing oneself to be taken advantage of – allowed Yaakov to stay Yaakov, and to proclaim, in the words of chazal, עם לבן גרתי, ותרי"ג מצות שמרתי.

In this period of time, but in all times, we would do well to remember these lessons. There is a Torah – timeless lessons – for Eretz Yisrael, where we belong; but there is also Toras Ha-Galus. Our destiny and permanent mission is to fulfill the former. Until we get there though, we need to absorb the lessons of the latter.

This touches upon one of my parsha pet peeves. Many people speak about Yaakov spending 14 years in the yeshivah of Shem and Ever. However, Rashi (28:9) clearly refers to it as Beis Ever. This is because by this time, Shem had already passed away. Indeed, a footnote in Emes l'Yaakov points out that while both R' Yaakov and the Chasam Sofer make references to Shem and Ever, Rashi, whose source is Megillah 16b, clearly refers to it as the yeshivah of Ever.

Have a good Shabbos.

Eliezer Bulka
WeeklyShtikle@weeklyshtikle.com

Shtikle Blog Weekly Roundup:

Dikdukian: Wordsthatsticktogether

Dikdukian: From his Sleep

Dikdukian: Complete it

Dikdukian: Qualification of the AHOY rule

Dikdukian: Different Types of Kissing

Dikdukian: Come on, People - Part II

AstroTorah: Did Yaakov Leave the Solar System by R' Ari Storch

AstroTorah: Yaakov's Lesson on Zemanei HaYom by R' Ari Storch


Please visit the new portal for all Shtikle-related sites, www.weeklyshtikle.com

The Weekly Shtikle and related content are now featured on BaltimoreJewishLife.com

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to shtiklelist+unsubscribe@weeklyshtikle.com.

Friday, November 29

The Weekly Shtikle - Toledos / Machar Chodesh

This week's shtikle is dedicated le'iluy nishmas my rebbe and Rosh HaYeshivah of Yeshivas Ner Yisroel, Harav Yaakov Moshe Kulefsky, zt"l (Yaakov Moshe ben Refael Nissan Shlomo) whose 24th yahrtzeit is this coming Wednesday, 3 Kisleiv.

With Rosh Chodesh falling on Sunday (and Monday), we do not read the regular haftarah for Toledos but rather, we read the special haftarah for the day before Rosh Chodesh, from Shmuel I (perek 20.) Yehonasan tells David that tomorrow is Rosh Chodesh and there will be a seudah. (For a discussion on how exactly Yehonasan knew it would be Rosh Chodesh since it was based on testimony, see the AstroTorah link below.) They devise a whole plan to confirm whether Shaul still bears mortal enmity towards David. R' Shimon Schwab, in Maayan Beis HaShoeiva, is bothered, is it only because of the fact that Yehonasan mentions the words "machar chodesh" that we read this haftara? Surely there is a greater reason to push aside the regular haftara in favour of this one. 

Rav Schwab explains, Yehonasan's intentions in telling David not to escape until after the seudah of Rosh Chodesh were because Rosh Chodesh, as the moon enters a new cycle around the Earth, symbolizes a time of renewal, on opportunity for repentance and atonement. Yehonasan was telling David to wait and see if Rosh Chodesh will possibly have this positive effect on Shaul and he will change his mind. Therefore, we read this haftara to impress upon the masses this important aspect of Rosh Chodesh. Additionally, Rosh Chodesh is a time destined for geula which is why we recite in Mussaf, Mizbeach chadash b'Tzion tachin. And if Moshiach doesn't come, we are left wondering "why has ben Yishai not come, not yesterday and not today" (20:27, a pasuk in the haftara.) The Navi remarks, vayipaked mekom David, David's place was vacant, an allusion to the fact that we, too, are lacking the presence of ben Yishai. And just as it was gratuitous hatred that caused David's absence from the party, it is exactly that that causes Moshiach to be absent today.

This reading of machar chodesh, heralding the coming commemoration of rosh chodesh, is perhaps made slightly more significant by the intriguing halachic quirk that comes along with it. According to Mishnah Berurah (55:45) based on a teshuvah from the BA"CH, someone who was born 13 years ago on 1 Kislev would become a bar mitzvah this year not on 1 Kislev but rather, the day before, 30 Cheshvan, which is the first day of rosh chodesh. For a detailed discussion, see R' Yehudah Spitz's Insights into Halacha.

 

Have a good Shabbos and Chodesh Tov.

Eliezer Bulka
WeeklyShtikle@weeklyshtikle.com

Shtikle Blog Weekly Roundup:

Dikdukian: (From the) The Fats of the Land

Dikdukian: Be'er Sheva / Shava

Dikdukian: I will eat, You will eat

AstroTorah: Yaakov and Eisav's Interesting Birthdays by R' Ari Storch

AstroTorah: When is Rosh Chodesh? by R' Ari Storch

AstroTorah: Fighting in Kislev by R' Ari Storch

AstroTorah: Sweet Fifteen by R' Ari Storch

 

Please visit the new portal for all Shtikle-related sites, www.weeklyshtikle.com

The Weekly Shtikle and related content are now featured on BaltimoreJewishLife.com

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to shtiklelist+unsubscribe@weeklyshtikle.com.

Friday, November 15

The Weekly Shtikle - Vayeira

This week's shtikle, as per tradition for parshas Vayeria, is dedicated le'ilui nishmas my brother Efrayim Yechezkel ben avi mori Reuven Pinchas, whose 48th yahrtzeit is next Tuesday, 18 Cheshvan.

 

At the end of this week's parsha, Avraham faces the ultimate challenge of akeidas Yitzchak. It is certainly not unreasonable to consider this the greatest of Avrhaham's 10 tests on a number of different levels. It is certainly worth noting that this is the one time the Torah actually refers to the episode as a test, (22:1) "VehaElokim nisa." However, Rashi, based on a gemara (Sanhedrin 89b) cites a deeper meaning of the beseeching nature of HaShem's request which seems, at first glance, to border on hyperbole. HaShem uses the word "please" as if to say, "Please stand up to this test so that people do not say of the first tests that there was nothing to them." Suppose Avraham had difficulty with this command. Suppose he had questions about this daunting, impossible task. Would that really have detracted from the utter devotion he showed in the previous tests?

 

R' Schwab, in Ma'ayan Beish HaSho'eiva, explains that while the first 9 challenges were all great in their own right, there was one very important element missing – the involvement of his progeny. Passing these tests were of great significance on a personal level for Avraham. But that, on its own, would not be enough to pass on to the great nation of which Avraham was to be the father. We often speak of Avraham as having instilled the will and the strength of self-sacrifice in all future generations. But this is not accomplished simply through genetics. Akeidas Yitzchak was a trial of sacrifice that Avraham and Yitzchak would experience together as father and son. Only through enduring this test and persevering together could this virtue be passed on. Indeed, if Avraham were to have failed this test in any way, his previous accomplishments would be of much lesser value to the generations that followed. This explains the urgency of HaShem's request.

 

Have a good Shabbos.

 

Eliezer Bulka
WeeklyShtikle@weeklyshtikle.com

Shtikle Blog Weekly Roundup:

AstroTorah: A Scratch on the Wall

AstroTorah: Witnesses to Sedom's Destruction

AstroTorah: The Mysterious Midrash by R' Ari Storch

AstroTorah: Lot's Twilight Escape by R' Ari Storch

AstroTorah: I Can't Believe it's not Fresh by R' Ari Storch

Dikdukian: Different Forms of Yirash

Dikdukian: Be'er Shava



Please visit the new portal for all Shtikle-related sites, www.weeklyshtikle.com

The Weekly Shtikle and related content are now featured on BaltimoreJewishLife.com

 

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to shtiklelist+unsubscribe@weeklyshtikle.com.